Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bi-Polar (Chilli album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Rozonda Thomas. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  chat 00:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Bi-Polar (Chilli album)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This unreleased album has not been noticed by sufficient third-party sources, either during its production or during its cancellation. There is not enough info available to merit an album article. A brief mention at Rozonda Thomas would suffice. D OOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 13:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rozonda Thomas, as per WP:NALBUMS, which states that: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." If the redirect is reverted, an admin can always protect the page.--hkr Laozi speak  17:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rozonda Thomas, as per above logic. A "shelved debut album" doesn't need its own article, if it didn't cause the MSM press to sit up and take notice. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:02, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment from nominator - I concur with the above votes but we might as well let this debate run its course. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 15:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete there is only one credible source which says Chilli was releasing an album called Bi-Polar. Everything in the article is unsourced and/or originally researched. There's not even a need for a redirect because there is no evidence that its existance was widespread knowledge, judging by the lack of coverage in reliable/trusted/credible sources. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  01:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.