Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bi-permissive

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was ambiguous.

The strict vote count would lead to a delete decision. (I count 8 delete to 4 keep as merge or redirect.) The current content is a mere dictionary definition and, based on the evidence presented during this discussion, is a neologism. Personally, I see no possiblity of expansion past the dicdef. The exact content is in the bisexuality article (though that is a recent addition to the article and may not last).

I am going to call this one as a delete decision with a qualifier. If the definition remains stable in the bisexuality article, please contact me so that I can restore the article and turn it into an appropriate redirect. (This is necessary to preserve the attribution history - a requirement of GFDL.) Rossami (talk) 02:24, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bi-permissive
nn neologism--Doc Glasgow 17:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - already covered by bi-curious   &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 19:34, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. --Carnildo 20:32, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to bisexuality. There's a section there on terminology, so I added this term to it.  Bi-curious is a little different. -- Beland 02:40, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge this one-sentence dicdef into bisexuality. Jonathunder 03:28, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
 * Delete - do not merge - do not re-direct. No googles neologism - it is unverifiable that this term has ever had even moderate usage. --Doc Glasgow 10:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Bisexuality. Megan1967 03:45, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no merge or redirect, per Doc Glasgow; the Google test should find a contemporary English sexual neologism with any usage at all. Samaritan 02:12, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism with no evidence of any usage at all. Quale 19:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bisexuality. Leanne 05:15, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism with no evidence of any usage at all. Axon 14:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- if Beland already added the term to a section of Bisexuality, that should be sufficient. Frankly I find the term a little ugly.


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.