Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bi-tarian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No RS, no opinion on transwiki seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  04:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Bi-tarian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod template removed. Simply WP:NOT.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 17:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing there but a definition. Can be transwikied to Wiktionary. — Cactus Writer |   needles  18:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and do not transwiki to Wiktionary. No reliable sources and the few Ghits imply it's more of a one-off joke than even rating as a neologism--borderline WP:MADEUP. Shawisland (talk) 03:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like a dicdef, and smells like a dicdef (and possibly a neo). No opinion on the transwiki to wiktionary. I suppose they can deal with it when it lands there.  Syn  ergy 05:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Upon searching, it appears that this is a slang term or something. I don't think it should be transwiki'd. 74.56.36.34 (talk) 08:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.