Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bianca Trump


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Although a vote count would likely lead to "no consensus" as a result, reading through the discussion and evaluating the arguments presented pushes me to conclude that deletion is the appropriate decision in this case. In particular, some of the "keeps" cited notability guidelines such as WP:PORNBIO, but these arguments were adequately refuted. All things considered, the subject simply isn't notable. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Bianca Trump

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Former porn actress with a local criminal history failing WP:PORNBIO and WP:NOT. Jmundo (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Reviewing the sources, she satisfies the general notability guidelines for me. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete:Not notable. This article is not about her not notable enough porn career, but more about her criminal history, which is just a list of minor crimes. The page reads like an WP:attack page. Note also the word "alleged" appears four times, it should not appear at all in a BLP, either a reliable source confirms she did these things, or this should be removed. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Martin451. Her porn career is not notable, and the rest is a series of minor crimes that are not notable of themselves. I do not believe that these minor items add up to showing notability. Kevin (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Morbidthoughts. She easily meets basic BIO and PORNBIO guidelines.  Xihr  01:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * She has not received nominations for well-known awards, or has made a unique contributions to a specific porno genre as required by PORNBIO. --Jmundo (talk) 03:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * She has also (AFAICS) never been a playboy playmate, or made unique contributions to a pornographic genre. Point 5 of PORNBIO says "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media." I don't think press coverage that is nothing to do with her porn career counts for PORNBIO, so she fails PORNBIO notability. The rest of the article is just news of a minor criminal, which also does not meet notability guidelines. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Morbidthoughts. Passes GNG.  Dismas |(talk) 08:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG. NOT#News doesn't seem to apply as the coverage goes beyond a single event. The sources seem reliable, despite being local papers. Epbr123 (talk) 14:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The offline sources are not only local but routine news reports ("Police find fake checks, IDs; Women jailed", "Drugs found after car pulled over", ""Robbery plan sours; escort, 3 others, held") --Jmundo (talk) 03:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete A BLP disaster zone, individual has at best extremely marginal notability, best to delete this mess. RMHED (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes the GNG and current version of PORNBIO #5; extensive press coverage over white supremacist association makes her name a very plausible search term. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per RMHED and nominator. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.