Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biancavilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. –  Rob e  rt  03:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Biancavilla
nonnotable location stub Abstrakt 18:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for above reasons Abstrakt 18:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * KeepSeems like a notable small town.Obina 19:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all real communities. Punkmorten 19:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Town of >20,000. Nominator is apparently unaware of relevant conventions. CalJW 20:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per CalJW. We currently have articles on towns waaaay smaller than this one. - Liberatore(T) 20:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Real town   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  20:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. No reason given to delete a town. -- JJay 22:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep A place with 20,000 people? When every settlement of 200+ people in some countries has an article?Some countries aren't that size - do we delete Nauru next? Grutness...wha?  01:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per CalJW. Real geographic location.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 03:43Z 
 * Strong keep. There are many towns with less than ten people on Wikipedia. Grandmasterka 03:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per above Werdna648T/C\@ 10:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.