Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibi Chowdhurani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Bibi Chowdhurani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable show, part of a massive group of non-notable show articles created by puppets (see Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj and User talk:Tanns.25630 for background). References are mostly a bunch of cruft indicating merely that the show exists. Doug.(talk • contribs) 14:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator


 * Comment. So this article from the Times of India is "cruft"? --Michig (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't go through every reference in every one of the scores of articles these puppets posted, neither do I think a single reliable source makes an article notable. That's particularly true in this case, the article you reference is used in the article merely to support the fact that Nibedita Biswas is an actress on the show.  That certainly doesn't make the show notable.  Particularly a show that all anyone can say about it is the "show was about a girl called Bibi who was a liar but ultimately the lies turned out to be beneficial for others". I've inserted the word "mostly" in my nom above to clarify.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 18:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * There's a whole article about the show from ToI linked above, which says a lot more than that about the show. There may well be more Indian coverage - Google isn't a very good indicator when searching for Indian topics. I wouldn't dispute that the article as it stands is poor, however. --Michig (talk) 19:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll close this nom based on the information you provided.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 20:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.