Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibi Mubarika Yusufzay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus, default to keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Bibi Mubarika Yusufzay

 * — (View AfD)

Procedural. Prodded, deleted, recreated with copyvio-looking text, nominated for CSD A7, which I declined. Concern was notability by association. I abstain. - crz crztalk 23:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Basically an Empress dowager, which seems to pass inclusion guidelines. However, revert back to this stub to get rid of copy vio info.  young  american  (ahoy hoy) 03:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Being the wife a famous person does name make someone notable; a Google search demonstrates that perfectly. --  tariq abjotu  03:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, at least until some claim of notability. Wives of famous people aren't inherently notable, less so when they keep around a dozen or so. JRP 03:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment If you think this page is bad look at Gulnar Agacheh (and, less awful but still not especially informative, Ayisheh Sultan Begum). DrKiernan 09:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Existence of a less-useful article isn't grounds to keep this one. I've WP:PRODded both of those now, thanks. JRP 15:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I absolutely agree, Gulnar Agacheh is a candidate for speedy delete. If there's ever a debate on that one, count me in on your side. DrKiernan 15:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * weak keep per young, from the rv text she seems to have played some role in the succesion, main problem seems to be ammount of extant info about her (at least if that text is reliable). maybe a redirect to her husband & mention there, or the relevant history article, is more appropriate? &rArr; bsnowball  15:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Babur, until some sign of notability provided. utcursch | talk 17:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/Ayisheh Sultan Begum - crz crztalk 17:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per youngamerican. Historic figures are verifiable and this one as an Empress dowager warrents inclusion. --Oakshade 23:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

She did move Babur's remain to kabul to baghe babur, could we at least mention that, I didnt save a copy of what aecis deleted so if any one has a copy please forward it to me. thanks(Khana bibi 02:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC))
 * Keep Do you delete all articles so quickly? it was gone within hours of posting. I know it wasnt very wiki written but that was the best I could do at the time and I assumed I would have a grace period of at least 24 hours to come and edit it. — Khana bibi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete See Articles for deletion/Ayisheh Sultan Begum. DrKiernan 08:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.  -- Hornplease 08:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.