Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical people in Christianity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 03:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Biblical people in Christianity

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Originating editor has not explained what this page is intended to achieve. It adds nothing to the encyclopedia. Fayenatic london (talk) 06:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete feels suspiciously like a WP:POINT or WP:CFORK violation, though I'm not sure of what. Redundant to List of Biblical figures. Great quote: "According to some Christians, Jesus is a main and central key figure in the new testament". cab 06:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. This subject is covered better in other articles. --Metropolitan90 07:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The list of is not able to explain what biblical people as a group are. I started the article, because there was no lead article for the Category:Biblical people. Maybe, someone is able to englighten the article... -- Bapho 09:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could understand a list of Biblical characters not in Christianity, but this is the default. -- Charlene 10:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant to other articles. Categories don't necessarily need a header article. Hut 8.5 13:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, what next? "Football players in the National Football League"? NawlinWiki 14:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Absurd. Greg Grahame 16:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - We already have lists of prophets in the Bible, and List of Biblical figures identified in extra-Biblical sources, most of whom have their own articles. All the other significant figues also have their own entries.  This article only includes a few of the (arguably) better known individuals, and with no apparent purpose or criteria that is actually followed.  ◄   Zahakiel   ►  16:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, purposeless list, redundant to other articles. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 17:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although the title was definitely worth a chuckle, it is a redundant useless article. --Hemlock Martinis 18:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Haven't got a clue what the aim of the article is Jack1956 18:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I almost suggested redirect--but what's the likelihood of someone searching for that here. Cruft, potential POV magnet. Blueboy96 20:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely redundant, both literally and theoretically. This is practically patent nonsense. VanTucky  (talk) 21:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is like "historical people in history books" or "Quran people in Islam". It has nothing to say and says it.  Mandsford 23:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The scope of the title makes it redundant. --Stormbay 23:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete origional research-- Sef rin gle Talk 03:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and cab. Carlossuarez46 18:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Biblical figures — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor falk (talk • contribs) 20:30, 11 July 2007


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.