Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of Prem Rawat and related organizations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. ff m  23:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Bibliography of Prem Rawat and related organizations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article should be merged deleted and any notable content placed in Prem Rawat. Kelly hi! 22:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * AfD is not a place to propose mergers.  Corvus cornix  talk  23:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, fixed my original statement. Kelly  hi! 23:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Deletion of material then merger of it into another article is a GFDL violation.  Corvus cornix  talk  23:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

As for the noteworthyness/viability of individual entries in the bibliography article: these points can be raised at Talk:Bibliography of Prem Rawat and related organizations, for instance at Talk:Bibliography of Prem Rawat and related organizations: discussing this at AfD in an all-or-nothing style is a bit surreal. --Francis Schonken (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. People should familiarize themselves with the edit wars that have taken place on Prem Rawat and related topics. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Nah, the idea is to apply Summary style, not only on Prem Rawat (which imho should be shortened due to over-all length, not expanded), but also on Divine Light Mission and Elan Vital (organization) – see: Talk:Bibliography of Prem Rawat and related organizations.
 * Comment AfD proposal is not appropriate.--Nik Wright2 (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Nominator has given no wiki policies this article is in violation of. Looks fine to me (in terms of keep/delete). Hohohahaha (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep At the moment, I don't see a conclusive argument in favour of deletion. Jayen 466 12:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have Category:Bibliographies by subject full of bibliographies, including the very similar Bibliography of books about Sathya Sai Baba and Neuro-linguistic programming bibliography. I don't see why this article should be deleted. It serves an encyclopedic purpose. ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 20:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.