Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of psychology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be restored in projectspace via WP:REFUND if there is any active interest in maintaining it there.  Sandstein  05:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Bibliography of psychology

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Over 18 years, this list has been expanded and recently gutted of most of its content. But, looking at the talk page, the criteria of what should be included here has always been sketchy and I don't see the page fulfilling the content guidelines described at Stand-alone lists. This is a decent subject for Wikipedia to cover but even if some editor or some WikiProject wants to take it on as a project, it might be better to start from scratch. Right now, it promises information that it doesn't deliver and its presence on Wikipedia is not a positive. Liz Read! Talk! 17:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Liz Read! Talk! 17:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Liz Read! Talk! 17:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Move to project space under WikiProject Psychology. BD2412  T 18:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete (optionally move to project space, if desired by wikiproject members) Rlink2 (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I posted a notice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology, inviting members to participate in this AFD but the talk page doesn't look like it's had much recent activity. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete or move to project space. ParticipantObserver (talk) 10:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.