Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliophagy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 13:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Bibliophagy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The word is primarily used as a metaphor and I can find no reference to the disorder except only http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/b/bibliophagy/intro.htm which leads me to believe it is suspect. Pontificalibus (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's fine. It was my first attempt at an article, and I had no idea that it was a type of metaphor.  (:  Chocolate Panic! (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete can find only metaphorical uses and the article is all from the two listed websites. I don't think it's notable. Hekerui (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to say something (since my other reply was short), when I googled the word for references, there were nine hundred and fifty-five results. Someone had posted it in the requested articles list, which was why I undertook the endeavor in the first place.  I would agree and say delete--it really isn't all that important.  Chocolate Panic! (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You did do a good job with it, try again or check out the articles on Pica (disorder) or Bibliophile if you are interested in either topic. Drawn Some (talk) 22:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the links! Chocolate Panic! (talk) 03:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - It seemed to be notable at first, but I couldn't find any reliable sources.  Ceran  thor 22:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * G7 Author requested deletion above. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 23:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I would rather the article go through the whole AfD process, since there is something there, and it may be revisited in the future. So I wouldn't consider a G7 vote appropriate analysis of the article. Prodego  talk  01:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.