Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliothèque Municipale de Riom (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Riom. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 07:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Bibliothèque Municipale de Riom
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no participants in last AfD. Fails WP:ORG. Libraries are not inherently notable. I could find no in depth coverage. Note there is no corresponding article in French LibStar (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge (or Redirect and let me merge after) For some reason the smallish article for the town of Riom has a section titled Public library which then simply has link to our article. If you disregard the section spacing, our article doesn't have that much text. The Public library section there would be a good fit for our text. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 03:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This is what they also did at the French article for Riom where the section is titled La bibliothèque intercommunale. It has about as much text as our article. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 03:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Riom. While the library is not notable enough for a standalone article, it is sufficiently old and its collections are significant enough to warrant a section of one or two short paragraphs in the article on its locality. PWilkinson (talk) 08:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge as perhaps enough to mention there. SwisterTwister   talk  07:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.