Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bickley-Warren Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Bickley-Warren Productions

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. Was prodded with rationale " I would recommend a merge with Miller-Boyett Productions but since there are no citations, it might be best to delete." but prod removed due to previous incarnation of article being prodded. No sourcing found Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Article is not eligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 02:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Topic is a company therefore WP:NCORP applies. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.