Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidarids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Bidarids

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the sources I have checked seem to be talking about some movement or unit. This looks made up. Slatersteven (talk) 15:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with Slatersteven. It seems to be a made up name.  None of the four sources used in the article mention this name.   Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  18:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - hoax - Sitush (talk) 07:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Bidar Dil appears to have been an actual prince who remained in hiding when some wanted to place him on the throne when Farrukhsiyar was deposed. See, e.g. The Mughal Empire, Part 1, Volume 5 ("regarded as most able of the Timurid princes"). I am not, however, finding anything substantiating the claims that he founded a dynasty or ruled vast lands in the Punjab under the title of Nawab-Azem. 24.151.50.175 (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'd be happy to be shown to be wrong, but I agree that this article fails V/NOR. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.