Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidenly Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Hoax (see others) seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  18:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Bidenly Hall

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hoax Kittybrewster   &#9742;  15:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax, per Articles for deletion/Baron Lavenham and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Peerage_and_Baronetage  Phoe  talk  15:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete appears to be part of a series of hoax articles. Content not supported by references. Choess (talk) 03:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as probable hoax, and delete all articles created by this editor, per the evidence of clear falsification of sources presented at Articles for deletion/Baron Lavenham. In this case, the two references supplied are to a claimed book, and to a village website http://www.pakenham-village.co.uk/Main/history.htm ... but google searches of that website produce no hits for "Bidenly Hall" and even none for "Bidenly". A wider search for "bidenly hall" -wikipedia produces only wikipedia mirrors. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - This appears to be a hoax.--Oakshade (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.