Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 22:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still nothing actually substantial as this was even only started his year, no substance at all. Notifying. SwisterTwister  talk  22:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As I noted at the first AfD - "An article about a company that has been around for 6 months but for which there are no references showing any notability. Searches yield very little which is perhaps not surprising when it was only constituted in 2015. Almost certainly too soon for a Wikipedia article."  Velella  Velella Talk  08:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is not a private company. This is a government body, Municipality. The population of Kolkata is greater than North European countries as Sweden and Finland. They have more than one Municipality. And this corporation is covered in reliable, independent sources. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 10:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- may be notable as a governing body of a town, Bidhannagar. The town is on the small size (200K population), so I'm not sure about actual notability. I believe this falls under "Politics" rather than "Company". There could be a case made for a merge to Bidhannagar, but I believe it's worth keeping for now. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.