Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidsar, Rajasthan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bidsar. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Bidsar, Rajasthan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Same article already exist on wikipedia Beedsar. There is no sense to create the same article again. Chu86happychu 15:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bidsar. No need for a duplicate article but it is a possible redirect target. Valenciano (talk) 15:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bidsar. Don't need two articles of the same topic. --Oakshade (talk) 04:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect' to Bidsar. No need for a duplicate article but sourses and references of Bidsar, Rajasthan seems to be more reliable and appropriate that's why my request to add this artical's structure to Bidsar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nawalgarh (talk • contribs) 10:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please do'nt remove Bidsar, Rajasthan article because it is more helpful and reliable than Bidsar in terms of given references. First of all copare these article before delete. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.41.10.3 (talk) 12:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * User Nawalgarh can you explain, why Bidsar, Rajasthan is more reliable than Bidsar in terms of given references. Even its seems that you have copied all the content from Bidsar to put them in Bidsar, Rajasthan. May be its also due to that Bidsar page is protected due to continuous violation of wiki policies. --- Chu86happychu 14:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:52, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * User Chu86happychu you can see and compare the reference list of both sections, and Bidsar, Rajasthan has also more information than Bidsar section. Now i would like to clear the issue regarding title of the article, Bidsar, Rajasthan more helpful than Bidsar to know more on Google because Google map has also same title Bidsar, Rajasthan on Google maps thats why map also appere at searching time of article Bidsar, Rajasthan on google map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nawalgarh (talk • contribs) 17:01, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Which article is better is irrelevant. If there are concerns that the existing article has inadequate referencing then the referencing in the Bidsar article should be improved. If the article is protected then the edit request should be made on the article talk page. If there are concerns about the articles title, then a requested move should be made at WP:RM. Setting up a duplicate article is not the correct way to do things. Valenciano (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes i understood your concerns that setting up a duplicate article is not the correct way to improve an exiting article and here also took place violations of wiki polices. But now i requested to you to change Bidsar article to Bidsar, Rajasthan as it is by WP:RM. Because Bidsar, Rajasthan's information are more useful and reliable in compare of Bidsar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nawalgarh (talk • contribs) 07:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - I've undone the copy/paste move, and the article is now back at the original Bidsar - article contents should never be copy/pasted to new titles, as that loses the editing history that is needed for copyright reasons. I have also updated Bidsar with User:Nawalgarh's changes, which was the correct way to do it (and if not autoconfirmed, it should have been done by request on the talk page). I have also redirected Bidsar, Rajasthan to Bidsar. Finally, I have unprotected Bidsar - I had protected it to stop IP editors adding details of non-notable people. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I've also redirected the various duplicates at Bidsar, Sikar; Bidasar, Sikar; Beedasar, Sikar etc - I think I got them all -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.