Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bien-Air Medical Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Bien-Air Medical Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reliable and independent sources don't exist to prove the article's notability. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete fails WP:CORP. Almost a speedy delete for spam. LibStar (talk) 14:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not yet committed to a keep !vote, but I have added information related to some of the company's intellectual property. The information added suggests they have substantial internal expertise in miniature electromechanics and have been actively pursuing protection for solutions they are incorporating into their products.  Hoping to find some material which is less esoteric, but such an IP investment does have influence on the fate of the firm; companies often acquire to secure IP.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 05:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Patent applications and granted patents are not sufficient indicators of notability.  HighKing++ 13:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Certainly patent applications are not. Granted patents are a contributor to notability as these are capital assets which influence the fate of the firm - in my opinion.  I don't think there is a firm ruling on patent grants explicitly NOT contributing to notability; certainly, they cannot alone establish notability. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.