Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big-boned cats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  | Talk 00:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Big-boned cats

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be an exercise in humor, and not a commonly used scientific classification. sources do not well support the notability of this term. In fact, it's possible that the whole article is simply a promotion for a specific humor web site. Prod removed by anonymous ip without comment or change. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The few uses of this term that I find online don't mesh at all with what is represented on the article...i.e. this source: .  I don't see any evidence that this is a notable term.  Cazort (talk) 22:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree this is probably spam; regardless there are no references and it fails WP:V. I42 (talk) 22:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense or spam. Take your pick. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 22:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a book of this title http://www.amazon.com/Big-Boned-Cats-Thomas-Handschiegel/dp/098201810X so spam is possible, assuming the editing hadn't been finished before prod and AfD. There again, the bigbonedcats.com site is about the book, so spam is quite likely, given the username of the creator of the article. Peridon (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Peridon - appears to be leaning toward spam Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good laugh though. This sounds like one for WP:DAFT. ←  Spidern  →  17:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lolcats. LOL. Bearian (talk) 21:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.