Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Bird Rodeo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 00:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Big Bird Rodeo
Neologism, 8 Google hits that aren't even related to the article, Delete O bli (Talk) 23:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC) (Side note by willrobbo This game is also known as the 'Fat Bird Rodeo'. Google that.)
 * Delete per nomination. Durova 23:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If this exists at all it would be better off in a dictionary of slang, as opposed to an encyclopædia.  (aeropagitica)   23:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Latinus 00:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. Ruby 00:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Whether this article was intended to be humorous or not, I sincerely believe it should be kept, because when i read this, it really did bring a tear to my eye (i was laughing that hard.) Wikipedia is for the enjoyment of the user,is it not? As such, i believe articles such as these should be kept, whether it is a hoax or not. Rasmuffin 04:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, but it can be kept in BJAODN where it belongs. Daniel Case 05:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep This is a valid article. I've heard of this game being played in Liverpool, Manchester and London. Whether it's widespread or not, the game's rules and content should be documented. THIS IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF EVERYTHING, IS IT NOT? Removing this article would remove valid information. --Willrobbo 16:31, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Ifnord 03:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment "Fat Bird Rodeo," the alternative recommended above, has three unique Google hits that appear to relate to the article topic. Brendan 16:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism/hoax/non-notable. Ifnord 03:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.