Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother (UK series 8)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This series is still months away, the article is pure unreferenced speculation. AfD is not a vote, and the keep reasons are much weaker than the delete reasons. —  Fire Fox  21:49, 23 July '06

Big Brother (UK series 8)
The article is based on total speculation, and includes no information that isn't already in other Big Brother UK articles. JD [ don't talk|email ] 22:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --LorianTC 23:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: it might never happen. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for violation of Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- Scientizzle 23:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 00:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unconfirmed? yet Highly Anticipated? --Escaper7 08:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save Dermot Confirmed it in the first BBBB. --equonix 14:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This vote was made by User:82.46.106.163.
 * It's still full of speculation, even if it is going to return. --LorianTC 13:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete for now, create it later once it has been officially confirmed --Alex9891 (talk) 00:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Alex9891. godgoddingham333 17:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save it has been confirmed by both Davina and Dermot on numerous occassions - Jezabelda 08:55, 22 July 2006
 * Save Dermot Confirmed it and then it was later confirmed by Davina. PB22 08:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save Davina and Dermot have both confirmed BB8
 * Save if it has been confirmed. I will delete The show's format is expected to be unchanged from previous years....There has been no runner up prize in previous years. (aka. the second paragraph) as we have NOT been told that the format will remain the same - they could well try someting different. Anon Dude 17:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Even if Big Brother does happen next year, do we really need an article that has absolutely no information in it, nearly 10 months before it's even going to be broadcasted? The article can be re-made nearer the time, and when there's actually information worth going in it.  -- JD [ don't talk|email ] 17:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.