Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother 2009 (UK) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no decision.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  (Non-admin closure) 00:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Big Brother 2009 (UK)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While the tenth season of Big Brother UK has been confirmed, having this article now is way too early. This article should be deleted and protected from being re-created until around March when details are released by the broadcaster.

Similar to how Big Brother 11 (U.S.) was deleted and protected from re-creation. (The 11th season of the US edition has been confirmed for the summer of 2009 as well but again no information will be released until next year)  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  10:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: I had just realized that I made the second nomination to delete this article and didn't know about the first I apologize but the article about Big Brother 11 (U.S.) can't be created right now and it has been confirmed to air in the summer of 2009, the audition process has started, and the executive producers have been already named then this article should be deleted since really the only thing we know is that there will be a tenth season of Big Brother UK. Also if the result of this discussion is keep then the same decision should apply to Big Brother 11 (U.S.) as well and it should be created since more information is known about it right now. ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  10:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  treelo  radda  11:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL --Banime (talk) 16:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and the fact that there'll be nothing else to write about till about March next year. Dalejenkins | 16:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy close and Speedy keep on the grounds that this passed AFD with a keep decision TEN DAYS AGO. Articles must not be renominated repeatedly in such a short period of time. 23skidoo (talk) 16:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note Like I said I didn't know this had been nominated when I opened it but if Big Brother 11 (U.S.) can't have an article at this time on the grounds of WP:CRYSTAL then the same should apply with Big Brother 2009 (UK). Both have been confirmed by their broadcasters to return next summer, but with BB11 USA we already know the executive producers and auditions have started. With BB10 UK we only know it has been confirmed, now the reason I didn't close it right after is the simple fact that it is unfair to one article to be created (BB10 UK) while another can't (BB11 USA). If the result of this discussion is keep than an article for Big Brother 11 (U.S.) should be created because they both fall under the same category.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  19:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.