Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Bruno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Big Bruno

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article cites a number of sources, only one of which is both reliable and independent. That source turns out to be a match report that namechecks the subject in a picture caption, and does not actually support a single fact in the article other than that someone with the stated real name once took part in a football game. Guy (Help!) 22:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

What defines a source reliable? There are multiple sites that have credible information that are stated in the sources regarding to the producer. If anything, the producer related to the article was just granted verification on Twitter, showing a status of being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slyguy1255 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete: This producer doesn't appear to have any notable work to his credit. If anything the article is coming too soon. Shallownotthou (talk) 12:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane 2007  talk 04:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost all sources are not independent, fails WP:NBIO. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a BLP with insufficient independent sourcing to meet WP:BIO. Possibly promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.