Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Fish Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Big Fish Theory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced, non-notable article, no track listing. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  14:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. A redirect until more content is added to the article would have been my preferred option. In the meantime, I have added sources to the article, and if the album indeed comes out in two days, then a wealth of additional coverage will surely become available along with the track listing.  gongshow  talk  15:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, to keep the article history, I would be on board with a redirect. In the mean time, would you be willing to comment on Articles for deletion/Hopeless Fountain Kingdom World Tour? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

(talk) 16:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete We need a speedy category for upcoming albums that fail WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM like this one and assume that they are WP:TOOSOON. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, , personally, I think that speedy deletion gets overused, and that one week of discussion is not necessarily a bad thing. BTW, would you be so kind and comment at Articles for deletion/Feed the Machine Tour? --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * PRODs take one week and require no discussion. AfDs usually take longer. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: If a standalone article is not appropriate at this time, just redirect. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, in the interest of keeping the article history, I do not disagree. With that said, would you be so kind and comment at Articles for deletion/Feed the Machine Tour? --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 *  Keep : The original complaints have been addressed, with a partial track listing added. Louis Waweru Talk  00:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, per WP:FUTUREALBUM, "generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label". With that said, would you be so kind and comment at Articles for deletion/Feed the Machine Tour? --Jax 0677
 * Thanks,, did not know about that. I've removed my keep vote. Louis Waweru Talk  04:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.