Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four (IT Services)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 18:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Big Four (IT Services)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

There is no discernable reason why this list only covers the top four, and no source for why four instead of five or three, for example. ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete – Unheard IT jargon. Probably a notion of user. undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   15:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete There's been a bit of press-release coverage of Tata Consultancy Services making the "Big Four" but, as Googling will show, this isn't a commonly used term in the way Big Four (audit firms) is. This page seems to be intended as advertising, especially as it links to TCS but none of the other three. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Little advert is seen and there is lack of content (notable ones) as well as WP:RS.  →TSU tp* 10:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.