Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four Beauty Pageant Titleholders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Big Four Beauty Pageant Titleholders

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Redundant. We already have list articles for the winners of the individual pageants. The grouping of the "big four" seems artificial: no source is presented describing them as the big four. Finally, there is no crossover among the pageants. This type of a list might be useful for boxing, where champions may hold multiple titles at once, but I don't see it adding anything beyond what is at the individual pageants' articles. —C.Fred (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 04:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A lot of work seems to have been done in the last few months on complete entries for individual Miss World/Universe/etc titleholders. This really is unnecessary and besides, the term 'Big Four' is an industry one and the listees are not likely to be searched for by it. Plutonium27 (talk) 10:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as fourth runner-up. Should any of the "Big Four" be unable to fulfill its Wikipedia duties, then it can take its place. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. We have plenty of lists with all the information inside of this one. Undeath (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - see Articles for deletion/Big Four pageants and Articles for deletion/Big Five Pageants PageantUpdater talk • contribs  03:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.