Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big International Non-Government Organisation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Big International Non-Government Organisation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable references prove this terms existance (other than wiki's, Wiki'mirrors and Blogs). NGO is the term applicable to all bodies listed here, and is more appropriate. Exit2DOS2000  •T•C•  04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   — Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Without looking, it's a non-notable concept as distinct to NGO. If the term exists, redirect to NGO. Wikipedia is not a dictionary Ddawkins73 (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  04:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Non-governmental organization per User:Ddawkins73's second suggestion -- the phrase does have some usage, hence some use as a search term, but it's still a NEOLOGISM with no encyclopedic quality beyond a DICDEF. Baileypalblue (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like Ddawkins73 I shuddered when I saw this one. I think BINGO also stands for Business-oriented International NGO. That seems like it would have more notablity than the superlative we are AFDing here. Even so, if it is in fact a real thing, then it may have mention in the NGO article, but doesn't need its own article. Valley2 city ‽ 09:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.