Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Jut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result wasDeleteBlnguyen (bananabucket) 04:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Big Jut


Does not appear to meet the criteria at Notability (music) – Gurch 03:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)a
 * Speedy Delete per A7 that means we also need to delete Screwed Up Fo Life word up!! Missvain 04:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Bazel 04:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * merge i think we should merge this article with Screwed Up Click
 * Delete, non-notable. Didn't think it was a speedy candidate, so I removed the db -- Samir धर्म  06:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per A7SkierRMH 09:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Screwed Up Click Amists  talk •  contribs 11:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and unlink all the redlinks at Screwed Up Click to save us having the same conversation all over again next week. Guy (Help!) 13:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Completely fails to assert notability. scope_creep 17:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.