Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Nate Flips Out


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Big_Nate. Michig (talk) 06:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Big Nate Flips Out

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not finding sources/reviews from reliable sources to qualify an article per WP:BKCRIT or WP:GNG. I found this page from USA Today, but it consists almost exclusively of content copied from Goodreads user reviews. This article from the Houston Chronicle provides some content, but it's mostly about the book series. Additional available sources are only providing passing mentions. North America1000 05:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Big_Nate. I found two reviews, but not really enough to where I would strongly say that this would merit its own page at this point in time. I usually like to have at least three reviews or two reviews and one good general source before I'd start arguing for notability, so if anyone can find anything else I'm open to persuasion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect-as said above. Wgolf (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect I agree with the redirect on this one. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 11:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as I have found another review here  and incorporated it into article. Also, I have noticed with some afds that deletionists use the lack of library holdings as a reason to delete so here it is the other way - Worldcat shows it is held in a substantial number, at least 1540, of libraries   Coolabahapple (talk) 18:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * change to redirect to Big_Nate as, on reflection, it is highly unlikely that article will be improved much beyond its present state.Coolabahapple (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.