Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Scoob


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  06:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Big Scoob

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Rapper who does not meet notability standards. Article appears to promote. No references to reliable sources. Contested speedy, removed by suspected sock/meatpuppet. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Admittedly, this is an article I've been sitting around looking to create, however had not done so because I knew that as things stand now, he doesn't meet any of the notability guidelines. That is why I chose to create this where did, as opposed to creating it in the main namespace (with the hopes that with the release of that album, he would weasel his way into notability). As things stand right now, he doesn't come close to meeting any of the notability guidelines for music, so I would support the deletion of this article if that doesn't change. However, I'm curious if a final ruling on this matter couldn't be postponed until the latter part of next week. His album releases today (Tuesday) and albums released through Strange Music have shown a tendency to work their way onto one of a few Billboard Charts on their release week. Thus, I suggest waiting to pull the trigger until the Billboard charts come out for this weeks sales. If he charted, then one could make an argument for C2 on the Music Guidelines. If at the end of the week next week, he's missing from such charts as the 200, Independent, Heatseekers, R&B/Hip-Hop or Rap, then I would 100% support the charge in clearing this article out. I don't see much point in jumping to a decision now, just for someone to create it next week again if he were to find his way onto one of those charts. Just some food for thought. Mizery Made  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 06:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Save the article in user space, and if he hits the Billboard charts, bring it to DRV. Until then, he's just not notable. (I wish you'd held off until the album drops.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - You say that as if I created the article. For the record, I didn't, nor have I even touched the article in terms of editing. Mizery Made  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 21:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Doesn't really matter in this case, as you are welcome to save it in your user space if you think it might come back to usefulness should this artist attain notability. Our you can do something totally new. Your call. Just trying to be helpful. I don't think it's going to survive this AfD, though. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Mizery Made, for such a good understanding of the music notability guidelines, you must also realize this violates WP:FUTURE. Clubmarx (talk) 06:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't yet meet WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:MUS Click23 (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.