Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Sky Flag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Big Sky Flag

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A user's design for a new flag for Montana is a non-notable subject. Stephen 04:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK...Now...how and why is that? What if the designers of the North Star Flag are users? Wolfdog406 (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No claim made for notability. No external sources. Fails WP:GNG. LK (talk) 05:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is effectively sourced only to the flag creator's own web page on Tripod.com. (The other source merely states that the current Montana flag design was poorly rated, but doesn't mention this Big Sky Flag.) The fact that someone is proposing a new flag for Montana is not notable unless the state of Montana is actually taking action toward adopting this new flag, and no evidence has been provided that the state is looking to replace its current flag at all. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Apparently, this has escaped the attention of any newspaper or television station in the State of Montana. Needless to say, we don't need the image of something that has "(C) 2009-2011 by Michael Riedel All Rights Reserved until it is officially adopted as the new flag of Montana." going with it.  The "C" doesn't stand for "copy this if you want to".  Mandsford 14:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable  Chzz  ► 14:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Quasihuman (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Ynyrhesolaf (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.