Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Time Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Big Time Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article without sources since 2007 N o f o rmation  Talk  10:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment So what POLICY does this warrant deletion under? Your argument is per WP:NOEFFORT. Note that AfD is not for cleanup.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I ran into this page because I had previously tagged Big Time Records (United States) with a CSD (once for G11 and once for A7) and the author of the US version linked to it from this article.  Finding that the US version was not notable I tried to verify the contents of this article but didn't find anything.  So to answer your question, I should have written "fails WP:V."  Realistically, I admit I should have prod'd first, my mistake.  N o f o rmation  Talk  22:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. It may be a challenge to find on-line sources to verify all the details, but Big Time Records was, in fact, a significant independent record company at one time.  Here's a couple of Billboard articles and a profile of one of the founders from the Sydney Morning Herald to start.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Clearly I made a mistake in conflating this Big Time Records with the one in the US. If there is a way to rescind an AFD I'm willing to do so. N o f o rmation Talk  21:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – According to Ian McFarlane, the label released material by a number of notable Australian artists, Air Supply A, Hoodoo Gurus B, New Race C, Jon Stevens D, Painters and Dockers D and Radio Birdman E. Magnus Holmgren's Australian Rock Database additionally lists The Beasts of Bourbon F, The Go-Betweens G, New Christs H and The Scientists I. The article certainly needs more work including refs but should not be deleted for lack of notability or for failing verifiability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * keep agree with above comments. first page of Aus rock database / google search here shows many notable Australian artists/bands released on this label. Kathodonnell (talk) 05:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * keep whilst no longer in existence this label in its time was important in the development of the Australian independent music scene. It is a notable label & should be retained, expanded if possible. Dan arndt (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.