Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Tits Zombie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, nomination withdrawn, no remaining delete votes other than mine, and I withdrew that too. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Big Tits Zombie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be a completely non-notable film. see below &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly and without prejudice, unless and until this can be sourced. Damn, that's high concept. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, if only because I've now learned a handy new word in Japanese: kyonyū. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Films-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Substantial coverage in relevant news channels, as evidenced in the "Find sources" links above. Minimal sources added to article. Hqb (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: I could be persuaded to keep this; the article's nomination state isn't the same as the current state. I'll wait for some more votes. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep TBH I wish I knew which of these horror sites could class as reliable sources but I can't be chewed to trawl through them. However, the Pop Matters cite is a nice one, Cinema Blend have thoughts in a similar vein. It's going to be distributed in the UK by this Terracotta Films, which has got attention from the UK anime/asian film magazine Neo (expect a review to follow in due course). It's early days, but it has already got attention and it's extremely unlikely that a string of reviews won't follow its release. Someoneanother 16:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There does seem to be buzz here, and while like Someone another I can't tell which of the g-hits have been vetted as fully reliable, several appear promising. Between those and given the minimal sources already added to the article, I think this one's a keeper. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * CHANGE NOMINATION TO WEAK KEEP, as the article we see now is not the same as the nominated version. If Ihcyoc changes his vote to keep, I'll speedy close. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 18:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.