Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Truck (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, consensus is clear even now. Just zis Guy you know? 00:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Big Truck (game)
Non-notable counter to the heavily-debated "The Game" silliness. Just created this summer, as this article admits. WarpstarRider 01:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Certainly fails WP:V.CindyLooWho 01:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; subject is non-notable. Wikipedia is not for things you make up with your friends. ~ PseudoSudo 01:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Huh? --Xrblsnggt 01:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Needs a better source than "is named after a song". --McGeddon 01:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, this article makes no claim for notability whatsoever. This was certainly made up in school one day. --- Deville (Talk) 02:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - WP:NFT Timrem 02:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but long live the game! --Liface 02:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable "game". From what I can understand, this is the same as "the Game", but with the word "lose" replaced with "win". J I P  | Talk 06:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Not a CSD candidate - WP:NOT is explicitly not a criteria for speedy deletion. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * They're using WP:NFT, not WP:NOT ST47 11:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * WP:NFT is a subset of WP:NOT. ._O Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NFT ST47 11:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, any article about the church fathers is clearly notable... wait, that's a typo? Oh well, delete per the above arguments then. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 12:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete someone has apparently mistaken us for Uncyclopaedia. Just zis Guy you know? 18:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Deletenn and I just lost the damn Game.Dev920 20:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Big truck! ~ PseudoSudo 22:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and rewrite the speedy deletion criteria to prevent this sort of complete and utter shit ever disgracing the 'Pedia again. Honestly, anyone with half a brain cell (that'd be the average player of The Game, then) can see that this is a pointless ripoff of another highly contentious article, only with even less sources. Is there scope for a whole article to be considered a piece of vandalism? Kinitawowi 23:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.