Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big noses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy deletion as author test. enochlau (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Big noses
Delete. Not quite original research, but if the topic is legitimate, it belongs under the appropriate subjects, such as the sections suggested by the author. As proposed, the page is poised somewhere between a joke and a research topic for the author. Slowmover 23:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Slowmover.La Pizza11 23:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neither original, nor research. Not interesting and no value. Pavel Vozenilek 02:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * My granddad had one of those. Halitosis too. Delete as original research cum joke. -- Krash (Talk) 03:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: G2. The author says on the talk page: "A sandbox wasn't enough... I want to see what Wikipedians do with something like this."  Sounds like a test page to me. -- Kinu  t /c  06:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.