Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big stare bo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Big stare bo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is basically a copy of the text (with changed name) of http://pacificrim.wikia.com/wiki/Axe-head. I don't think the types of monsters appearing in the Pacific Rim movie are notable enough for articles. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. On a title of knifehead or axe-head it would be non-notable. On a title of big stare bo it looks like pure vandalism. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourcable article as WP:MADEUP name. Perhaps redirect and mention the film and game antagonist/monsters to Pacific Rim (film) or Pacific Rim (video game) later on... if or when they get independent coverage.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Nuke it (delete) So many things are wrong with this - it's a copy from Wikia, it has a frankly stupid title, notability isn't inherited, it's written in in-universe style, etc. Ansh666 17:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Only source is a wiki. This was created by a newbie and, looking at some of their other edits it looks like they are messing around. We might direct then to the Teahouse to see if anyone there wants to help and turn them into a productive editor. MarnetteD | Talk 04:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This creature appears to lack the notability for a separate article. (How does this ever get to Afd??). --Stormbay (talk) 02:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Honestly? I AfD'd the article instead of CSDing it because I couldn't determine the precise CSD category to put it under; I've been burned before for not picking the right one, and after being "reminded" a couple times to reread the CSD pages after choosing G1 instead of G3 (f'rinstance), I tend to AfD anything remotely borderline just to be safe. (Hmm, that came out a bit whinier than I intended, but I think I'll leave it.) -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand the burned before situation. I didn't expect a response to my musing, but Thanks!. Stormbay (talk) 22:37, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.