Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigfoot: The Unforgettable Encounter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Bigfoot: The Unforgettable Encounter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Movie that does not appear to satisfy WP:MOVIE. Was PRODded and deleted some 10 days ago, and recreated today. The article's history before the deletion was also restored. Bonadea (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:MOVIE has five points for notability. For point 1, while it may have had some sort of commercial release, I can't find any mainstream critic reviews.  Point 2 doesn't seem to apply.  Points 3, 4, and 5 are nowhere near applying.  Therefore, it fails the criteria, and should be deleted.  gnfnrf (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. A notability guideline says: "The film features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career." I would argue that the involvement of Zachery Ty Bryan was important in the later development of his career. This appears his first lead role in a movie. Also, this movie appears to have been distributed in more countries than just in the US as I am from the Netherlands and remember seeing it. Need some more time to dig up a reference to prove that though. - Mgm|(talk) 08:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - this was a big film in its day and if any policy suggests that it shouldn't be listed then we need to change that policy. Skip1337 (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep; while I find it unlikely that it was "a big film in its day" (independent film, apparently direct-to-video?), it seems marginally notable. Everyking (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.