Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to Wheel of Fortune (American game show). I've decided to merge only the first section, on show records, and not list every grand prize winner or loser. But the stuff will be there in the history, and this is a wiki, after all. Mango juice talk 14:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune
Nonencyclopedic fancruft. &mdash;tregoweth (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC) What's "fancruft"?JTRH 01:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Marge to Wheel of Fortune Yes fancruft, and there is a similar page nominated for deletion today as well. JTRH: WP:FAN if youre interested. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 01:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Totally unsourced, violates WP:VERIFY. --Dennette 02:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If sources can be found then merge to Wheel of Fortune.  --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 talk  contribs   Count 05:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. J I P  | Talk 09:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delelete unencyclopedic, unsourced, American biased.--ZayZayEM 14:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Wheel of Fortune --mathewguiver 14:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Wheel of Fortune -- JTRH 19:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Wheel of Fortune Cynical 21:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Michael, et al.; those who are inclined to edit Wheel of Fortune then may, to be sure, determine to what extent the material can be sourced and is encyclopedic (I'm inclined to ascribe the appellative fancruft to all of it, but many of our game show articles, it should be observed, are replete with similar collections of minutiae, such that there appears to be no consensus for its categorical removal). Joe 00:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per all above - noteable enough for the wheel of Fortune article, but not enough to have an article of it's own. - Blood red sandman 15:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Wheel of Fortune. This fits in better as a part of the Wheel article. Chris 01:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge This is ridiculous. Delete it because it's unsourced? Put up an unsourced tag! Delete it because it's American-centric? IT'S ABOUT THE AMERICAN VERSION OF THE SHOW! If you want ones about versions outside of the US, then make them, but don't delete this one. Personally, I think it's too long to merge into the already long main WOF article, and I'm fine with leaving it as its own article. This is Wikipedia, for crying out loud. CrossEyed7 20:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * merge with wheel of fortune article is best Yuckfoo 17:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep valid spinoff from wheel of fortune... will only clutter the main article and be spun right back off if merged.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 20:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a significant addition to the sum total of useful information about the glorious and tragic history of the human race. Herostratus 13:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.