Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigtec Private Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Bigtec Private Limited

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-Notable and the second section seems a little advert. NefariousOpus 06:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

About the Bigtec Pvt. Ltd. page- Can you help me with it, then? I just read it at the cited sources and i thought I'd try my hand at writing a company bio. User: Isaac.Hume I'm sure you'd do a better job. —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Needs a tidy up for tone, but in my opinion the reasonably lengthy articles about the company in The Times of India and Mint, both of which are probably considered newspapers of record, confers sufficient notability. Gr1st (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, X  clamation point  01:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: a biotech and informatics company offering "business solutions" - i.e. yet another tech business without a clear showing of notability, using Wikipedia for free publicity. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable company. --GDibyendu (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.