Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihar Dalit Development Organization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Bihar Dalit Development Organization

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, promo, largely based on the own website and related sources The Banner talk 12:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Even without going into Hindi and Bhojpuri coverage ,it is a notable  organisation  in Bihar in a area of caste conflict.It is also known as Bihar Dalit vikas samiti.Several Google Books hits even without considering Hindi and Bhojpuri sources.

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Yes, I have been searching on the Hindi name. But passing mentions convey no notability. The Banner talk 07:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment on above sources. At least one source (#1) is self-published by the organization. About half of the sources above are very minor mentions of. sentence or less. I tend to agree that the org looks notable, but would note that the list above makes it look a lot more notable than sources actually make it.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , the book is typical Dalit-promo-BS but can you clarify upon your claim of self-published.Thanks! &#x222F; WBG converse 07:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, got the clue:-) &#x222F; WBG converse 07:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment-Borderline stuff (weakly skewed towards keep) but will be commenting in some detail. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The Book (#1) was written by Prof A .K Lal of Govind Ballabh Pant Social Science Institute in 1997 Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:33, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. The organization looks notable enough. MaeseLeon (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep has decent coverage in books. Much greater coverage is expected in Hindi and Bhojpuri sources as they are the local language of the region. per WP:BIAS-- D Big X ray ᗙ  11:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.