Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bijan Kazem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Bijan Kazem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find significant coverage independent of the subject of this BLP. Do not believe he meets GNG, BASIC or any other notability criteria. J04n(talk page) 22:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sorry - although he has won a Golden Thimble award, this is an excellent student achievement rather than the Parisan De d'Or awarded to those at the top of their game. I did find two very nice quality 2006 sources but both in relation to the Parson's student presentation - a Women's Wear Daily article on Highbeam and a surprisingly good American Superstar Magazine piece - I'm amazed to find such a high quality piece of journalism on a "Superstar Mag" site! A passing mention in the New York Times. All from 2006 and I see nothing from afterwards to show ongoing coverage or that he passes general notability criteria. Mabalu (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.