Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bijoy Kumar Sahoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Bijoy Kumar Sahoo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject doesn't have significant coverage in media and as well as reliable source. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Sadhakm (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC) I have given the source for each. He is well know person in Bhubaneshwar. He is being covered in news I am giving the link here https://www.telegraphindia.com/1160228/jsp/frontpage/story_71767.jsp http://www.dailypioneer.com/state-editions/bhubaneswar/cii-odisha-interacts-with-canada-envoy.html https://odishalive.tv/people/interviews/dr-bijoy-kumar-sahoo-president-cite-interview-digital-marketing/ http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/sai-international-school-launches-two-centres-of-excellence-109051600037_1.html http://www.orissalinks.com/orissagrowth/topics/district-all/district-cuttack/page/3
 * Delete being a member of lots of boards is generally not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete with thanks to Krishna_Chaitanya for providing additional sources. Unfortunately they consist of trivial mentions or interviews, although the first one (telegraphindia) is decent. But it isn't enough for WP:GNG. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.