Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bike lane debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to segregated cycle facilities. Two contributors (TedE and SPUI) have hinted that something here might be worth adding to that article. In case that is true, and because redirects are cheap, I will preserve the history. The last version of the article may be viewed here. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Bike lane debate
This is not an article; it is a collection of disembodied arguments and rebuttals not attributed to any people. Thus, they are not facts and cannot be verifiable. Maybe an article can be made for this topic, but the current contents are unsalvageable. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely awful. george 19:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Put whatever is verifiable into Bike lane. Ted 20:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to bike lane and keep the history, as there may be something salvageable. Note this on the talk page for bike lane. --SPUI (T - C) 21:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.