Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bil kulin

Bil kulin
Silly, Neologism, Not noteworthy, take your pick. --fvw *  22:42, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
 * Is this trolling or meta-trolling? Either way, delete. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\talk ]] 22:47, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Butchering the English language is not article-worthy. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 22:53, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. See Lucky 6.9's comment below. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 00:01, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * If this gets deleted, people will think the posts in question are funny, and they'll think it's alright to flood bandwidth with the nonsense that is being referred to on Newsgroups and message boards. So no, leave it be!
 * Speedy delete and ban the user and his talking hosiery. This "Bil kulin" nonsense reared its ugly head a few months ago in the form of vandalism.  Leaving this up for five days only encourages the responsible parties. - Lucky 6.9 23:12, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Is it possible that at least the idea of banning me will be dropped? It was harmless. -Johnissoevil 18:09, 16 Dec 2004
 * Well, my suggestion isn't etched in stone. Since you were classy enough to step up to the plate on this, of course not.  It's just that these spawned all sorts of vandalism before.  Here's hoping you'll find more and better ways to contribute. - Lucky 6.9 00:56, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. It'll turn out to be as short-lived as all newsgroup fads. P Ingerson 23:37, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Celebration of an e-mail funny. You had to be there.  Geogre 01:54, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy, prank, nonsense. Wyss 03:47, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. To paraphrase Huey Long, when vandalism comes to Wikipedia, it calls itself anti-vandalism. --Szyslak 03:43, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)