Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilambil Jets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Convinced that this team isn't eligible for an article at this time.

Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith. If you disagree with this decision, please take your objections and concerns to Deletion Review instead of my talk page. Thanks again and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 23:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Bilambil Jets

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Amateur Rugby team in the village of Bilambil, New South Wales (Population 500). Given that about 12% of Australians are males aged 12-35%, they would have about 50 available players to staff their teams to play against the other villages/small towns in the region. No notable achievements or indept sources Bumbubookworm (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. A very small local sports club. LibStar (talk) 03:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There is some sustained long term coverage of the subject.  I have not checked these but there are potentially over 700 references available here. The significant majority of these will be routine and-or minor and some not relevant, but even if only 1% are good references, there may be sufficient to support GNG.  Looks like insufficient BEFORE was done.  Aoziwe (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.