Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilateral Cotranscendentalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Bilateral Cotranscendentalism
No google hits for title, appears to be Original Research. Delete. Fightindaman 04:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Looks like somebody read Emerson and decided to create a religion out of it. The history of stuff he had in there and then blanked makes for amusing reading. Fan1967 04:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NFT and WP:NOR -- Samir ∙ TC [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]] 04:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Bucketsofg 04:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Last time I checked, WP is not for starting cults.   dbtfz talk 05:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Alpha269 14:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  14:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. Smerdis of Tlön 17:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per well argued nomination. ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  22:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.