Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biljana Electronica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Planet of the Bass. Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Biljana Electronica

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This character is not independently notable from Planet of the Bass. Cerebral726 (talk) 15:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge with Planet of the Bass: Not independently notable. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Covered by the NYTimes, Washington Post, and more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.186.18.78 (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * While those are reliable and independent sources, is the coverage they provide of the subject significant, separately from Plant of the Bass? - UtherSRG (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * separately from Plant of the Bass? is not a policy based qualifier and should be disregarded by anyone choosing to respond. While I understand the sentiment, it's fundamentally a non-sequitur qualifier: if an element has sigcov in context of something else, specifically a parent topic, that's still sigcov. Jclemens (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It's policy in WP:INHERIT. The topic can't be deemed notable if its only claim to notability derives from the notability of another topic. The references provided may provide SIGCOV of the parent topic. Do they provide SIGCOV of this topic? - UtherSRG (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with your argument, but I also feel the need to point out that WP:INHERIT is an essay, not a policy or guideline. Sock   ( tock talk)  12:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge Does not appear to have enough SIGCOV. Ping me if more is found. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ULPS  ( talk •  contribs ) 23:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:1E. Sock   ( tock talk)  12:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep ImStevan (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Why? QuicoleJR (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge with Planet of the Bass SUBWAYguy 12:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong keep as it is sourced and meets notability standards. Also, the character/song is very new and thus has the opportunity to expand. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2crzppul (talk • contribs)
 * Strong merge — it is absolutely not independently notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loytra (talk • contribs)
 * Merge or redirect to Planet of the Bass. Keep voters do not provide any rationale. The stubby article does not meet GNG at present. Feel free to pin me if anyone wants to show which sources have SIGCOV, but pending that, as I said, redirect/merge. There is no indication sources cited focus on the character rather then the larger work. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.