Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilkis Dadi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I restored the AfD believing that it was wrongly closed by its nominator. The closure is clear indication of withdrawal. See User talk:DiplomatTesterMan. Hence, closing the discussion as KEEP, with Nomination withdrawn note per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 11:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Bilkis Dadi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Just being in the "TIME magazine's 100 most influential people" list isn't a criteria of notability is it? Does not meet GNG. DTM (talk) 09:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Short article that can be expanded, she is mentioned in 3 reliable sources JW 1961   Talk  10:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, per WP:BEFORE, there is sufficient in-depth, secondary coverage of her in RS online for her activism, including articles that don't mention her Time 100 nomination:, , etc. Captain Calm (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as being face of a resistance movement that is of national significance definitely makes her important to be available on Wiki. As a woman at her age, it is rare to become face of resistance . We have examples of Maya Angelou and Arundhati Roy who fight for humanitarian cause, and their pages available on Wikipedia.
 * Delete Just mention in multiple sources does not depicts notability. Notable only for event, Wikipedia is not news and Fails WP:GNG. As already mentioned, the "Times 100" is not a criteria for notability at all. Zoodino (talk) 06:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep the subject has become globally notable. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep but remove "dadi" from title. -- Eatcha 08:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note that there is a potential better article at Bilkis Bano‎, not without its own problems, which has just been turned into a redirect to the Dadi article. I accepted this at AFC with this comment on the talk page: The lady is notable enough, though I agree as WP: BLP1E. I have accepted it in its current state and to flagged for cleanup. It is a borderline acceptance and I feel it is useful to allow the community to decide. I remain neutral in this discussion. Fiddle   Faddle  11:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep No doubt she has become a notable person for showing her extraordinary courage and convictions at this old age. Look at all the favorable international news coverage she is getting. Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.