Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill2phone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 23:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Bill2phone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Repeatedly tagged with prod and db-g11 in the past. Has not improved since six months ago. Alexius08 (talk) 04:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep The article as written is highly confusing; it is almost impossible to understand the point of it, much less assess its notability. From what I can gather, however, it seems like this subject may indeed merit an article. However, a rewrite of the entire article is in order. The first line makes the article seem like an advertisement (which it isn't) because it refers to the subject as being offered by one company, later broadening the scope of the article to other companies. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Stubify - The subject seems to be marginally notable. Alternatively, convert this into an article on the concept (over-the-phone billing?  no idea what it would be called.) with the included history on it and include mention of the particular providers of these services.  Grandmartin11 (talk) 23:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge The nomination is just WP:NOEFFORT but AFD is not cleanup. This particular service seems to be notable and, in any case, there is the larger topic of Mobile payment to which it might be merged. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.