Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Anagnos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Bill Anagnos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable stuntman lacking non-trivial sourcing red dogsix (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 15:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 15:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 15:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 15:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as this seems somewhat obvious with no obvious better improvement. Pinging . SwisterTwister   talk  05:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - While they clearly don't pass WP:NACTOR, nor meet WP:GNG (since I couldn't find any in-depth coverage), I feel they do pass WP:BASIC: If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. A search on Books returns dozens of mentions, showing his activity in the film industry, including this, which I feels satisfies the Basic requirement, that and his appearance in more than 170 films and television shows. Very poorly sourced, but I think an interested party could source this better.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.